Green Building Chronicles

Beltane Hill

Home Green Building Special Events Possibilities
About Us AzureGreen In The News Economic Development Middlefield, MA News
Building Photo Diary Supplier Opportunities Job Opportunities Contact Us
The Green Building Chronicles Conceptual Art
Building Tasks Building Progress Photo Diary

Green Building Chronicles
By Tamarin Laurel

March 4, 2004

This is hardly the beginning of the project, but it is the point at which I feel the need to track the various tasks and leads and dead ends.  There are too many things up in the air to be without a log entry system. 

Beginnings

To set the stage… I personally believe in having an ecological relationship with the world we live in.  I am not experienced in building construction or engineering.  But I am the co-owner (with my business partner) of a commercial-building-to-be.  Since I will be paying for it, I want it to reflect my ecological philosophies, and to be affordable to maintain through the years.

We began, in 2001, by talking to the commercial lenders with whom we already did business.  Direction from the lenders was simple: Keep in mind that the standard rule of lending is to mortgage only 80% of the appraised value of the building.  Mortgage holders will be looking at the resale potential of the building, and will judge that by how well it offers usable space for an easy-to-market cost and function.  Specialized functions reduce the ease of marketing.  Similarly, added costs for installing “green” features were not viewed as a marketing asset.  The lenders recommended a goal of the lowest possible cost per sq. ft.  (For example, in 2001, builders estimated the low end was $40/sq. ft. for warehouse space, and $90/sq. ft. for office space)  The lenders recommended that the more expensive, windowed, finished, office space be kept to under 30% of the building’s total square footage.  They also recommended we work with large commercial building firms whose bonded rating was beyond question.

Next we met with such commercial builders, saw examples of their work, and discussed design ideas with their architects and engineers.  We spoke of our ecological philosophy, but believe our words were foreign and unheeded.  We were offered various standard box designs, and told that utility consumption would likely run $30,000/year for the 24,600sq. ft. design.  The commercial builders considered that 82˘/sq. ft. annual utility expense quite reasonable, or “great.”

We were not satisfied with the design, and gave up on working with Design-Build firms.  We had imagined there’d be great convenience and efficiency in having architectural design, engineering, and contracting all in one firm.  But it did not give us an experience of knowing that individuals who shared our philosophies would be implementing them.

Energy Modeling

Fast forward to 2004.  We have chosen an architect, and an engineering firm. (see Design Team)  We’ve also picked an energy systems commissioning agent –Michael Tillou of etc Group, Inc.  Mike is also proficient on the DOE2 energy modeling software for analyzing the yearly utility costs for various choices of systems and materials.  He submitted a scope of work for energy modeling. 

My first question was “Hadn’t someone already done any energy modeling/ analysis as part of the designing of the geothermal heat-pump system, or the $12,000 paid to a respected firm for HVAC system design? Or as part of the basic conceptual design by an architect with ecological values?”  The answer was “No.”  (After calls to both engineering firm and architect.)  Rule of thumb estimating was probably used by those experienced in a specific system, such as the geothermal.  Standard building code analysis for worst-case heating and cooling load was used for the HVAC design.  If a firm has the right software, then they can take the analysis to the next level of determining annual energy cost and life cycle cost.  But even our engineering firm, of 35 members covering all engineering disciplines, still sub-contracted out such energy modeling work.

Now that I knew I wouldn’t be duplicating work already done, I just had to figure out which energy choices I needed analyzed in order to make the best decisions.

March 8, 2004

I had scheduled a site visit with an alternative energies expert and installer from the far side of my region, because alternative energies experts are few and far between.  I invited other Design Team members to attend, so that we could all be working on the same page.  But the meeting was cancelled due to health issues and spring snowstorm.

I changed tactics from conversational brainstorming about the possibilities, to seeking written bids on specific systems and their general price ranges.  This way I could share the information with the Design Team without having to gather people in one place.  And –I reasoned—theoretical systems that might be possible but for which I had no installer, and no idea of cost, were not going to be useful to my decision making task.

I set out to find installers and systems to seek bids on.  We are located in Western Massachusetts, between the Berkshires and the Pioneer Valley (Connecticut River), between Southern VT, Northwestern CT, and NY east of Albany.  A web search on photovoltaic rebate opportunities turned up 4 leads for all of Western Ma.